July 29, 2018

Independent Contractor vs. Employee—Easy as A, B, C?

Independent Contractor vs. Employee ABC Test

In April of this year, the California Supreme Court handed down its much anticipated opinion in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court, an opinion that clarifies when workers in California should be classified as employees or as independent contractors.

The Old “Borello” Test

Prior to the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Dynamex, the Borello test prevailed. Under the Borello “economic realities test,” courts first evaluated whether the person to whom service is rendered has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the results desired. Then, a number of additional factors are taken into consideration, none of which are dispositive on its own, but all of which are evaluated in the totality of the circumstances. These factors generally included:

  1. Whether the person performing services is engaged in an occupation or business distinct from that of the principal;
  2. Whether or not the work is a part of the regular business of the principal or alleged employer;
  3. Whether the principal or the worker supplies the instrumentalities, tools, and the place for the person doing the work;
  4. The alleged employee’s investment in the equipment or materials required by his or her task or his or her employment of helpers;
  5. Whether the service rendered requires a special skill;
  6. The kind of occupation, with reference to whether, in the locality, the work is usually done under the direction of the principal or by a specialist without supervision;
  7. The alleged employee’s opportunity for profit or loss depending on his or her managerial skill;
  8. The length of time for which the services are to be performed;
  9. The degree of permanence of the working relationship;
  10. The method of payment, whether by time or by the job; and
  11. Whether or not the parties believe they are creating an employer-employee relationship.

The New “ABC” Test

The Supreme Court in Dynamex reevaluated the multi-factor Borello test, and as a result there is a new, three-factor “ABC” test used when evaluating whether a worker has been properly classified as an independent contractor. The Court held that the analysis begins with the rebuttable presumption that a worker is an employee and that an entity classifying a worker as an independent contractor bears the burden of rebutting the presumption by establishing each of the following three factors:

(A) that the worker is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact; and

(B) that the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and

(C) that the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed.

Failure to satisfy any of the three factors of the ABC test results in a finding that the worker is an employee and not an independent contractor.

What This Means for Hiring Entities

The new ABC Test provides a more rigid framework for compliance and less flexibility in the “grey” areas. As a result, hiring entities should be cautious when classifying workers as independent contractors to ensure that the worker’s classification will satisfy the ABC test. Hiring entities are encouraged to seek the advice of experienced legal counsel whenever classifying certain workers as independent contractors.

Print This Article

About the Author

Lee Miller and Ilana Kaufman
Lee Miller and Ilana Kaufman
Lee A. Miller and Ilana M. Kaufman of Miller Law Partners counsel employers throughout California on all aspects of employment law with regard to compliance and assisting them with workplace investigations, employment-related audits, as well as with the preparation of workplace policies and procedures. Practice areas include litigation, wrongful termination, harassment, discrimination, retaliation, and individual and class action wage and hour lawsuits. They can be reached at Miller Law Partners PC. Read more about Lee Miller and Ilana Kaufman...



Ensuring Litigation Success

Raised in Northern California, Ian Corzine has helped create a fast-growing insurance and business law practice in Southern California with clients nationwide. Ian Corzine, of West Corzine, LLP is not your stereotypical insuran...
by Brian Hemsworth

Warning Your Trademark is Expiring. Or Is It?

Warning! Your Trademark is Expiring. Or Is It?

A lot of time and expense are put into registering trademarks. Here are some best practices for registering and protecting your business from scammers. For small business owners and start-ups, registering a trademark is fairly ...
by Dana Delman, Esq.

The Path To Partner, Yi Sun Kim

The Path To Partner

How Yi Sun Kim, the newest partner at Greenberg & Bass, parlayed a bad economy, hard work and philanthropy into a burgeoning practice and a happy life. When you have a conversation with Yi Sun Kim, you quickly get the idea ...
by Jerri Hemsworth



Employers Don’t Have To Ensure Lunch

The California Supreme Court recently ruled that employers are under no obligation to ensure that workers take legally mandated lunch breaks. This case has impact on millions of California workers and thousands of California em...
by Jerri Hemsworth

Are Your Employees Blogging You Into Bankruptcy?

Are Employees Blogging You Into Bankruptcy?

An employer’s biggest productivity concern used to be whether employees were taking personal calls or playing solitaire on the computer. Social media has added a new demand for employer protection from cyber activities. Today...
by Karen Gabler



Be the first to comment!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>